OBJECTIVE
To determine the uniformity of dosage and weight of
tablets and capsules.
INTRODUCTION
The uniformity of the dosage units can be
demonstrated by either content uniformity or mass variation.
Weight variation (WV) test can be done only on
certain unit dose as shown in Table 1. Other unit dose will need to undergo
content uniformity (CU) test.
In weight variation test, measurement of contents is
done by estimation of contents based on weight. Pharmacists often use and
misuse this WV test by doing this test on all dosage units. If it is used
correctly, this WV test can be used to measure content uniformity (CU). There
are some conditions in which the weight difference can determine the percentage
difference in the API in the individual dosage units. Hence this WV test can be
useful in the quality control of drug production.
MATERIALS
AND APPARATUS
Apparatus :Weighing balance, weighing boat
Material : 20 Tablets and 20 capsules
A.
Tablets:
Ettracin tablet
PROCEDURES
1. 20 tablets were selected randomly and weighed.
The average weight was determined.
2. The tablets were weighed individually and for
each tablet, the percentage deviation of its weight from the average weight was
determined.
3. The deviation of individual weight from the
average weight should not exceed the limits given below.
No.
|
Individual
weight of tablets(g)
|
Percentage of
deviation(%)
|
1
|
0.6564
|
-2.28
|
2
|
0.6749
|
0.48
|
3
|
0.6772
|
0.82
|
4
|
0.6617
|
-1.49
|
5
|
0.6749
|
0.48
|
6
|
0.6461
|
-3.81
|
7
|
0.6974
|
3.83
|
8
|
0.6681
|
-0.54
|
9
|
0.6805
|
1.31
|
10
|
0.6930
|
3.17
|
11
|
0.6740
|
0.34
|
12
|
0.6709
|
-0.12
|
13
|
0.6627
|
-1.34
|
14
|
0.6825
|
1.61
|
15
|
0.6824
|
1.59
|
16
|
0.6570
|
-2.19
|
17
|
0.6709
|
-0.12
|
18
|
0.6779
|
0.92
|
19
|
0.6748
|
0.46
|
20
|
0.6504
|
-3.17
|
Total weight of 20 tablets =13.4337g
Average weight : 13.4337g / 20
=0.6717g
Percentage of deviation = x 100%
B.CAPSULES:
AMPILIN ANTIBIOTIC CAPSULE 250MG
PROCEDURE
1. 20 capsules were selected at random.
2. One capsule was weighed. The capsule was then
opened and the contents were removed as completely as possible. The emptied
shells were weighed. The net weight of its contents was determined, that is by
subtracting the weight of the shells from the weight of the intact capsule.
3. The procedure was repeated with the other 19
capsules.
4. The average net weight was determined from the
sum of the individual net weights.
5. The percentage deviation was determined from the
average net weight for each capsule. The deviation of individual net weight
should not exceed the limits given below.
No
|
Individual
weight of capsules(g)
|
Weight of
emptied shells(g)
|
Net weight of
the contents(g)
|
Percentage
deviation(%)
|
1
|
0.3596
|
0.0640
|
0.2956
|
0.24
|
2
|
0.3425
|
0.0636
|
0.2789
|
-5.43
|
3
|
0.3651
|
0.0672
|
0.2979
|
1.02
|
4
|
0.3447
|
0.0660
|
0.2787
|
-5.49
|
5
|
0.3633
|
0.0647
|
0.2986
|
1.25
|
6
|
0.3454
|
0.0690
|
0.2764
|
-6.27
|
7
|
0.3595
|
0.0624
|
0.2971
|
0.74
|
8
|
0.3629
|
0.0627
|
0.3002
|
1.80
|
9
|
0.3714
|
0.0626
|
0.3088
|
4.71
|
10
|
0.3676
|
0.0623
|
0.3053
|
3.53
|
11
|
0.3409
|
0.0625
|
0.2784
|
-5.60
|
12
|
0.3752
|
0.0635
|
0.3117
|
5.70
|
13
|
0.3561
|
0.0653
|
0.2908
|
-1.39
|
14
|
0.3637
|
0.0651
|
0.2986
|
1.25
|
15
|
0.3629
|
0.0627
|
0.3002
|
1.80
|
16
|
0.3582
|
0.0647
|
0.2935
|
-0.47
|
17
|
0.3576
|
0.0645
|
0.2931
|
-0.61
|
18
|
0.3758
|
0.0637
|
0.2941
|
-0.27
|
19
|
0.3766
|
0.0634
|
0.3132
|
6.21
|
20
|
0.3524
|
0.0651
|
0.2873
|
-2.58
|
Total net weight of the content of 20 capsules =
5.8984 g
Average net weight = 5.8984 g / 20
=0.2949 g
DISCUSSION
Since our average weight of the tablets exceed 250mg
so the deviation should be±5.0 % for maximum
eighteen tablets and only±10.0 % for minimum two
tablets. From the results, we can see that all the 20 Ettrocin tablets are having standard deviation
of ±5.0%. There is no tablets of having the ±10.0 standard deviation. Hence
this indicate that the production of uniform tablets.
If there are more than two tablets of exceeding the
±10.0 standard deviation, this may indicate the ununiformed weights of the
tablets and at the same time may indicate the occurrence of errors. The errors
might include the presence of tablet fragments or dust on the tablets when
weighed. It can also be the systematic error caused by the inaccuracy of the
weighing balance. Environmental factors such as vibration of the table or wind
from the air-conditioning may also cause the fluctuation in the value presented
by the weighing balance.
However, the variation in the weight of the tablets
may be explained by the following. Factors such as the flowing properties of
the powder, the speed of tableting machine, the pressure used in compression
and the type of machines used in tableting may affect the weight of a tablet.
However the two most common causes of weight variation are the differences in
the bulk densities and particle size distribution during compression.
For capsules, since our average weight is 295 mg,
the deviation of individual net weight should not exceed the limits given
below:
From the results, all our capsules are having a
deviation of ±10%, which means that all capsules have uniform weights. This may
indicate the uniformity of the capsules production. At the same time, this
uniformity may also be caused by the usage of a good weighing balance. The
weighing balance used for measuring the weight of capsule is more accurate as
it is a more advanced balance.
If the weight variation in capsule exceeds the
limit, this may be due to the defect of the capsule filling machine. The machine
may have misalignment of the upper and lower capsule segments or problem in
filling the capsule with the target fill weight.
CONCLUSION
The tablets and capsules tested have passed in the
test of weight uniformity. This means that both the tablets and capsules tested
in this experiment have uniformity in weight production of them.
REFERENCES
1. http://www.pharmainfo.net/files/idownloads/pharmacoeialtestfoDF.pdf
1.Donald K. Lightfoot. (n.d.) Answers To 10 Common
Questions About Capsule Filling. Retrieved date. 21st December 2013. From
http://capsugel.com/media/library/answers-to-10-common-questions-about-capsule-filling.pdf
2.Dshravani. (2013) Citing Websites. Quality Control
Of Capsules. Retrieved date. 21st December 2013. From
http://www.pharmainfo.net/quality-control-capsules
No comments:
Post a Comment